xeMn0taCS !H,Cj8n_iZ2f8}#DtJKpNJG[(|E(f(IYp(~'/A;B :o> I3lFF UBER EATS ACCUSED OF DISCRIMINATION OVER FREE DELIVERY FOR BLACK-OWNED RESTAURANTS DoorDash pointed to statistics that show Black-owned businesses saw revenue drops of over 50% and a more than. In a filing submitted on Sunday, Uber Technologies Inc. and Uber USA LLC argue that the petitioners have no grounds to ask for the requested relief because contrary to their assertions, Uber is not resisting arbitration. On May 13, 2021, Uber paid Case info is listed online and his firm is all over google for the win. Many businesses require their consumers and employees to sign mandatory arbitration agreements, believing they protect against expensive lawsuits. Ubers presentation of Justice Ramos caused a re-assignment of the case days before the hearing on the preliminary injunction after the previous judge, Justice Barry Ostrager, notified the parties of his ongoing personal relationship with Justice Ramos. [*4]arbitration counterparties seeking reimbursement of the fees <>stream AAA from closing any open arbitrations due to Uber's refusal to pay AAA's invoice, and A leading legal champion of this effort has been Mr. Consovoy, 45, a Trump lawyer who mixes Jersey guy affability with an affinity for some of the most divisive culture-wars legal disputes. Consovoy also represented Trump in his protracted legal fight to prevent Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance from obtaining the former president's tax returns. The Cal CP Arbitration Uber's platform, "Uber Eats," allows . Uber Technologies Inc.'s claim that the American Arbitration Association is using a $91 million bill to further an "extortionate scheme" looks more like a haymaker thrown late in a losing fight Calif. Bar's Judicial Vetting Plan Is Step Back, Advocates Say, Crowell & Moring Promotes Alma Asay To C-Suite, Recent Data Breach Puts Scrutiny On ABA's Tech Authority. CA Rules repeatedly state AAA will charge fees as outlined in the attached fee schedule. July 12, 2022In a crucial victory for our client the American Arbitration Association (AAA), HHR helped secure denial of Uber's motion for preliminary injunctive relief in its bid to block the AAA from charging nearly $92 million in arbitration fees. Uber's platform, "Uber Eats," allows customers to order takeout from various restaurants and have it delivered by a driver for a restaurant-specific delivery fee. By then, Mr. Consovoy was too ill to argue them himself, so two of his partners did instead. Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP, New York (Roberta A. Kaplan of counsel), for appellants. He was 48. *"&QugkCv)MhD"@!=]34dY8Rdc;@ uu)E_k-]zB8VTX(XBYei? Make your practice more effective and efficient with Casetexts legal research suite. claim, as AAA was fully within its express rights under the CA Rules to charge the fees set forth Per the food delivery services arbitration agreement barring both court and collective actions, more than 20,000 customers filed arbitration demands beginning in October 2020 over Ubers conduct that they claimed amounted to federal and state law civil rights violations. According to the fee schedule, for each case, Uber would owe AAA a $500 filing fee, a $1,400 standard case management fee, and a $1,500 arbitrator fee, for a total of approximately $107 million if charged the full amount under the fee schedule. Mr. Consovoy often led the charge in attacking existing laws in court or defending new ones. He clerked for Judge Edith Jones of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit before becoming the first student from George Masons law school to clerk for the Supreme Court. favor" (Gilliland v Acquafredda Enters., October 4, 2021, 1:00 PM EDT. the fees after the parties could not agree to a more efficient manner of proceeding with over While Uber is trying to avoid paying the arbitration fees associated with 31,000 nearly identical cases, it made the business decision to preclude class, collective, or representative claims in its arbitration agreement with its consumers, the April decision said. endobj The decision set off a wave of new voting laws, including limits on early and absentee voting. And Justice Reed specifically found that, to the extent that Uber could not recover the money it paid to AAA, that was the natural consequence of [Ubers] business decision to require in its consumer agreements that all disputes be determined by the AAA. He grew up in nearby Florham Park, where, like any self-respecting Garden State native, he developed a lifelong love for the Philadelphia Eagles and Bruce Springsteen. 2022 N.Y. Slip Op. Rather, in its suit against AAA, Uber sought a declaration barring AAA from billing Uber for the costs associated with the arbitrations on the grounds that those costs were unreasonable and not justified by AAAs actual costs and expenses. customers to order takeout from various restaurants and have it delivered by a driver for a After Uber announced in 2020 that its food-delivery branch, Uber Eats, would waive fees for Black-owned businesses, Consovoy McCarthy arranged for some 31,000 complainants to claim. Shortly after, the law firm of Consovoy McCarthy PLLC began searching for Uber Eats customers who paid a delivery fee to a nonblack owned restaurant during the relevant time and asking them to challenge the lawfulness of Uber's policy by claiming it constituted unlawful reverse race discrimination. of the Hearth House Condominium, 190 A.D.3d 473, 474 [1st Dept 2021]). case, Uber would owe AAA a $500 filing fee, a $1,400 standard case management fee, and a prohibiting discovery, monetary sanctions, and orders of contempt. endobj In doing so, AAA was This is the second time Ubers individual-arbitration requirement has blown up in its face. Name, mailing address, email address, phone numbers, online identifier, Internet Protocol address, Social Security number, driver's license number, passport number, or other similar identifiers, education, employment history, bank account number, credit or debit card number, other . No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment and restitution, and unfair competition Attorney advertising. PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial. Uber requires consumers to sign agreements that they will bring claims against the company in private arbitration rather than in public court. Mr. Consovoy represented Mr. Trump in his fight to prevent Congress from forcing the release of his tax returns. Because Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in finding that Uber failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits on any claim, this Court need not reach the issue of arbitral immunity under California law. Uber failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits for any of its claims. Dan Weiner, John Townsend and Jack Kilgard represent AAA on the matter. Uber could be on the hook for $92 million or more in arbitration fees, depending on how far the cases go. ;kF_UT^+T_GONS>s[$l would succeed on its declaratory judgment breach of contract claim. Dan Weiner, John Townsend and alum Jack Kilgard represented AAA on the matter. He knew every argument, the upside of the argument, where were vulnerable, where were strong.. Moreover, the arbitrator may impose severe sanctions on the breaching party, including entry of a default judgment, prohibiting discovery, monetary sanctions, and orders of contempt. 2022). Ubers motion to dismiss is the latest filing in a multi-case saga that started with lawsuits filed by Uber Eats customers over an allegedly racially discriminatory pricing policy charging customers who ordered from Black-owned businesses less than those who ordered from non Black-owned businesses. However, Uber may not seek a declaratory Uber says it has received more than 8,500 demands for arbitration as a result of it ditching delivery fees for some Black-owned restaurants via Uber Eats. Moreover, the arbitrator may It is also unlikely to succeed under the unfair prong, as AAA's . Full title:Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. American, Court:Supreme Court of New York, First Department, Appeal No. Uber failed to establish likelihood of success on its claim under California Unfair Loan Holder LLC, 174 AD3d 150, 163 [1st Dept 2019]), and here, which would be a monetary judgment precluding the preliminary injunction (see Credit Before: Acosta, P.J., Kern, Gonzlez, Shulman, JJ. California Code of Civil Procedure 1281.97. Uber is effectively seeking a CALIFORNIA COURT RULES UBER CAN CONTINUE PUSHING PRO-GIG WORKER MESSAGES. authenticate users, apply security measures, and prevent spam and abuse, and, display personalised ads and content based on interest profiles, measure the effectiveness of personalised ads and content, and, develop and improve our products and services. Uber failed In doing so, he advanced the controversial legal argument that Congress had virtually no capacity to investigate the president beyond an explicit legislative agenda even if the president were involved in illegal activity. 3Y^j{4J Sign up for notifications from Insider! 2. He and Mr. McCarthy steadily expanded their firm from a two-man start-up to a 22-lawyer operation. judgment when other remedies are available, such as monetary damages (see Atlas MF Mezzanine Borrower, LLC v Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying Uber's motion for a Uber Eats is being accused of discrimination after it waived delivery fees for some Black-owned restaurants over the summer. It's also worth noting that the representative for the customer listed in the complaint is Consovoy McCarthy, whose partners include President Donald Trump lawyer William Consovoy and others. Uber has received more than 8,500 demands for arbitration over the food delivery app's policy of waiving delivery fees for some Black-owned restaurants. Uber previously paid $155 million to settle thousands of driver arbitrations. Uber asserted declaratory judgment claims based upon breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment and restitution, and unfair competition in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law (Cal Bus & Prof Code 17200 et seq.). The Protocol, while not explicitly [*3]mentioned in Uber's Terms of Use, has language regarding Mr. Consovoy was perhaps best known for his work with Edward Blum, the conservative activist who engineered the effort to have the Supreme Court overturn Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act and, more recently, to outlaw affirmative action in higher education. asking them to challenge the lawfulness of Uber's policy by claiming it constituted unlawful NY Slip Op 32080(U). Uber stated it would pay that amount, but "under protest." Cal., Inc., 2 Cal 4th 342, 374 [1992]), and while it chose not to exercise its discretion and reduce the fees after the parties could not agree to a more efficient manner of proceeding with over 31, 000 arbitrations, there is no evidence AAA acted with dishonesty, deceit, or unfaithfulness to duty (Storek & Storek, Inc. v Citicorp Real Estate, Inc., 100 Cal.App.4th 44, 59 [2002]). First, a trial court ruled in the AAAs favor. restaurant-specific delivery fee. in June 2020, Uber announced it would waive its delivery fee charged to customers for orders After Uber announced in 2020 that its food-delivery branch, Uber Eats, would waive fees for Black-owned businesses, Consovoy McCarthy arranged for some 31,000 complainants to claim reverse discrimination through arbitration, leaving the company owing as much as $92 million. Simultaneously, Uber moved for a preliminary injunction to preserve the status quo by enjoining AAA from issuing any additional invoices, prohibiting AAA from closing any open arbitrations due to Uber's refusal to pay AAA's invoice, and extending the invoicing deadline in the event Uber's claims cannot be adjudicated before then. AAA adopted a new, reduced-fee schedule for "multiple consumer case . reasonableness of fees, but the sections referenced by Uber primarily deal with ensuring The parties and AAA then engaged in months of fruitless negotiations to come up with a Because Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in finding that Uber failed to establish a Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying Uber's motion for a preliminary injunction. He clerked for Justice Clarence Thomas during the 2008-9 Supreme Court term, and he came away with the conviction that the court was poised to tilt further to the right and that constitutional rulings that had once been considered out of reach by conservatives, on issues like voting rights, abortion and affirmative action, would suddenly be within grasp. action warranting restitution (see McBride v Boughton, 123 Cal App 4th 379, 387, 20 Cal AAA did reduce Uber's initial fees after Consovoy McCarthy began filing demands by the thousands in the latter half of 2020. <> Stay up to date with what you want to know. The decision affirms the ruling of the Commercial Division of the New York Supreme Court in October 2021 that denied Uber's motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to suspend AAA's invoice to Uber for administrative costs associated with 7,771 arbitration cases. Rather, the Further, Uber could avoid the alleged irreparable harm caused by AAA by changing the assigned arbitration organization for the 31, 000 cases. and the remaining batches each containing approximately 7,771 California cases. endobj AAA exercised its discretion as to the filing fee, and reduced it to Over the course of a relatively short career, Mr. Consovoy established a reputation as one of the best and most dogged conservative litigators before the Supreme Court, with a penchant for cases aimed at making major changes to Americas constitutional landscape. 4a 3e' @ Rptr 3d 115, 120-121 [2004]). Mutual Fund and ETF data provided byRefinitiv Lipper. In doing so, AAA was committing to invoice Uber a minimum of approximately $91.6 million. In 2014, Mr. Consovoy and Mr. McCarthy, who was also at Wiley Rein, left that firm to found Consovoy McCarthy. That was not the case with him. On September 14, 2021, AAA issued an invoice demanding payment of $10.879 million for immunity under California law. appellants. payment was made under protest[*2], it would return such fees arbitration fees associated with 31,000 nearly identical cases, it made the business decision to ConcurAcosta, P.J., Kern, Gonzlez, Shulman, JJ. endobj Uber Eats is being accused of discrimination after it waived delivery fees for some Black-owned restaurants over the summer. Please see our Privacy Policy. Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert R. Reed, J. Uber was ordered to foot the bill for thousands of arbitration cases filed against it. to interpret and apply the fee schedule to a particular case or cases, and whether to consider an However, before that goes into effect, Californians will be voting on Proposition 22, an Uber and Lyft-backed measure that will maintain gig workers as independent contractors. If you would like to customise your choices, click 'Manage privacy settings'. and Uber would be settled by binding arbitration administered by the AAA in accordance with The demands, filed by thousands of Uber Eats users who signed up online with the Consovoy McCarthy law firm, say Uber broke the law by requiring them to pay delivery fees for orders from non-Black-owned businesses. Shortly after, the law firm of Consovoy McCarthy PLLC began searching for Uber Eats Consovoy and McCarthy created their original two-person firm after leaving a large Washington practice about eight years ago. Petitioners are 7,271 customers of the Uber service Uber Eats. x\mo8 "ok{Ma{RGI&v*;vbi e3CJ!Yrx/Jj{_no 1ja*+[,FhYa ^mo98.+7^!|GzpC=8r8*Oq0{[|P@?>)m,]L/U William Spencer Consovoy was born on Aug. 31, 1974, in Plainfield, N.J. https://www.hugheshubbard.com/legal-notices-methodologies. Uber Eats made this change in June . Password (at least 8 characters required). then. TechCrunch firstreportedthe news. In 2020 alone, he argued against an extension of the deadline for mail-in ballots in Wisconsin, the re-enfranchisement of felons in Florida and a California plan to send absentee ballots to all registered voters. AAA responded by stating if AAA then broke the claims down into five different batches, with the first batch containing 477 non-California cases, and the remaining batches each containing approximately 7, 771 California cases. alternative payment process for multiple case filings. Uber says it has received more than 8,500 demands for arbitration as a result of it ditching delivery fees for some Black-owned restaurants via Uber Eats. Uber stated it would pay that amount, but "under protest." It is also unlikely to succeed under the unfair prong, as AAA's enforcement of its fee schedule does not offend public policy, and is not immoral, unethical, oppressive, unscrupulous, or substantially injurious to consumers (People v Casa Blanca Convalescent Homes, 159 Cal.App.3d 509, 530 [1984]). In a filing submitted on Sunday, Uber Technologies Inc. and Uber USA. +Knj#cxc2^?e%--3J<=1$Nkko%4P c^bd{#d}SX% MD'9Zh>Qx&|M+xe8w0Ro7x{uaR\1;Y?V?AjrMdkL 8|9Aut/U [Cal. AAA also invoked California Code of Civil Procedure ], Inc. v Marathon Dev. (together, Uber) and defendant the American Arbitration Association, Inc. (AAA) over fees for 2020. In hot-button cases, lot of times passions overtake logic, and that was not the case with him. Readers are advised that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. endobj Competition Law, which provides that "unfair competition shall mean and include any unlawful which denied plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunctive relief, unanimously affirmed, without ], Inc. v Marathon Dev. Consovoy also didnt respond to a comment request, nor did the AAA or its lawyer Ted Hecht. Following the death of George Floyd in June 2020, Uber announced it would waive its delivery fee charged to customers for orders placed at certain qualifying Black-owned restaurants from June 4, 2020 through December 1, 2020. Shortly after, the law firm of Consovoy McCarthy PLLC began searching for Uber Eats customers who paid a delivery fee to a nonblack owned restaurant during the relevant time and asking them to challenge the lawfulness of Uber's policy by claiming it constituted unlawful reverse race discrimination. While Justice Ostrager initially maintained that his relationship with Justice Ramos would not affect his presiding over the case, he decided to recuse himself after AAA objected to Ubers presentation of a well-known, recently retired Commercial Division justice as an expert in that same court. I think he was one of the greatest lawyers of our generation, Neal Katyal, an acting solicitor general for President Barack Obama, said in a phone interview. This is a contract dispute between plaintiffs Uber Technologies, Inc. and Uber USA, LLC (together, Uber) and defendant the American Arbitration Association, Inc. (AAA) over fees for approximately 31, 500 similarly situated arbitrations. Legal Statement. While Uber alleges that it, the claimants, and AAA are all bound Were proud to support Black-owned businesses with this initiative, as we know theyve disproportionately been impacted by the health crisis, Casserly said. <>stream Law360 Pulse may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.Youll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Justice Reeds Oct. 14 decision on Ubers motion for a preliminary injunction to suspend AAAs invoice came after two days of arguments and testimony from Uber and AAA witnesses. Rather, the CA Rules repeatedly state AAA will charge fees as outlined in the attached fee schedule. Uber commenced its lawsuit after law firm Consovoy McCarthy brought more than 31,000 demands for arbitration on behalf of Uber Eats customers alleging "reverse discrimination" arising from Uber's efforts to support Black-owned restaurants following the police killing of George Floyd in May 2020. the granting of the preliminary injunction, and (3) a balancing of the equities in the movant's Those cases, brought on behalf of Students for Fair Admissions, an organization that Mr. Blum founded, reached the Supreme Court last fall. Uber commenced its lawsuit in New York Supreme Court's Commercial Division against AAA after law firm Consovoy McCarthy brought more than 31,000 demands for arbitration on behalf of Uber Eats customers alleging "reverse discrimination" arising from Uber's efforts to show support for Black-owned restaurants following the police killing of George Both she and his father survive him, as do his stepfather, Bernie Whalen, and his sister, Amanda Consovoy. For Justice Thomas, I believed, judging was not about slogans, labels or legal theories, Mr. Consovoy said in a 2016 speech at George Mason. Thomas McCarthy, a close friend with whom he founded the firm Consovoy McCarthy, confirmed the death. Mr. Consovoy was diagnosed with brain cancer in 2020 and stepped away from litigation last fall. impose severe sanctions on the breaching party, including entry of a default judgment, payment of the case management fee for the first batch for a total of $667,800 by April 30, endstream Rules, which included a fee schedule for individual cases. Identifiers and Personal Information. He denied the accusation, and no charges were ever brought. While Uber is trying to avoid paying the From October 26, 2020 to December 9, 2020, the Consovoy Firm filed over 31, 000 substantively identical arbitration demands with AAA on behalf of the Uber Eats customers against Uber. Those lawyers have leveraged the high fees of individual arbitration to get big companies like Doordash and Family Dollar to come to the settlement table, as Insider has previously reported. arbitration." Find out more about how we use your personal data in our privacy policy and cookie policy. I received an email from consovoy McCarthy to accept $370 settlement. This is a contract dispute between plaintiffs Uber Technologies, Inc. and Uber USA, LLC respondent. Following the death of George Floyd Uber solely seeks declaratory The policy was started as a way to support the Black community in the wake of the killing of George Floyd and a month after it was put in place, Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi announced the policy would be extended through the rest of 2020. Mr. Consovoy graduated from Monmouth University in 1996 with a degree in political science, and from the Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University in 2001. 2021-03782, Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. American Arbitration Association, Inc., Defendant-Respondent. ?JGRn#pm` Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP, New York (Roberta A. Kaplan of counsel), for About 31,500 cases accuse Uber Eats of reverse race discrimination.". reverse race discrimination. cases. You can change your choices at any time by clicking on the 'Privacy dashboard' links on our sites and apps. The group is represented by attorneys William Consovoy and Patrick Strawbridge of the law firm Consovoy McCarthy. The Cal CP Arbitration Rule provides that a drafting party that fails to pay arbitral administration fees or costs under the arbitration administrator's rules within 30 days of the "due date" is deemed to be "in material breach of the arbitration agreement, is in default of the arbitration, and waives its right to compel arbitration." Quotes displayed in real-time or delayed by at least 15 minutes. In legal papers, they have called the Uber Eats arbitration a ransom by politically-motivated lawyers.. 655549/21Case No. committing to invoice Uber a minimum of approximately $91.6 million. Uber and its lawyer Roberta Kaplan didnt respond to requests for comment. But now two courts have rejected that argument, pointing to the language in Ubers own contracts. Unlock these benefits today when you sign-up for a FREE 7-day trial: Read more on the latest California legal trends in Lexis, 2023, Portfolio Media, Inc. | About Law360 Pulse | Contact Us | Terms | Privacy Policy, Enter your details below and select your area(s) of interest to receive Law360 Pulse daily newsletters, Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported). ), entered October 15, 2021, Thus, it is unlikely Uber would succeed on its declaratory judgment breach of contract claim. Allegedly, Consovoy eventually was able to file more than 31,000 such claims against Uber in The law firm Consovoy McCarthy PLLC then gathered more than 31,000 claimants who paid delivery fees to non-Black-owned restaurants and filed arbitration demands claiming that the fees constituted unlawful reverse race discrimination. Convalescent Homes, Inc., 159 Cal App 3d 509, 530, 206 Cal Rptr 164, 177 [1984]). endstream Eventually, it was required to pay $700,000 to facilitate 500 more cases, pending a final decision by a state appellate tribunal. and administratively close the case files. The court is widely expected to decide in favor of Students for Fair Admissions before the end of the term, most likely in June. Uber commenced its lawsuit after law firm Consovoy McCarthy brought more than 31,000 demands for arbitration on behalf of Uber Eats customers alleging reverse discrimination" arising from Uber's efforts to support Black-owned restaurants following the police killing of George Floyd in May 2020. Uber stated it would pay that amount, but "under protest." AAA responded by stating if payment was made under protest[*2] et seq. In June, Uber announced that it would be waiving delivery fees for independent Black-owned restaurants as an incentive for customers to order from those businesses. Uber has not shown a likelihood of success on the merits of its breach of implied covenant endstream According to the fee schedule, for each Law360 Pulse takes your privacy seriously. If you do not want us and our partners to use cookies and personal data for these additional purposes, click 'Reject all'. AAA also invoked California Code of Civil Procedure 1281.97 to 1281.99 (the Cal CP Arbitration Rule). However, Uber may not seek a declaratory judgment when other remedies are available, such as monetary damages (see Atlas MF Mezzanine Borrower, LLC v Macquarie Tex. placed at certain qualifying Black-owned restaurants from June 4, 2020 through December 1, Uber failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits for any of its claims. approximately 31,500 similarly situated arbitrations. !yc1uU]\/O,f0v^Grdt2I>kEuu\S.+kF#dp\*uP judgments for the four claims in its complaint. In 2013, in one of his early cases before the Supreme Court, Mr. Consovoy was part of the team that successfully argued the Section 4 case, Shelby County v. Holder, persuading the Court to get rid of the requirement that several states and counties, mostly in the South, had to receive federal clearance before changing their election laws. While Uber alleges that it, the claimants, and AAA are all bound by the CA Rules and Consumer Due Process Protocol Statement of Principles (Protocol), neither of those documents requires AAA to charge reasonable fees related to its actual costs. duty (Storek & Storek, Inc. v Citicorp Real Estate, Inc., 100 Cal App 4th 44, 59, 122 Uber commenced its lawsuit in New York Supreme Courts Commercial Division against AAA after law firm Consovoy McCarthy brought more than 31,000 demands for arbitration on behalf of Uber Eats customers alleging reverse discrimination arising from Ubers efforts to show support for Black-owned restaurants following the police killing of George Floyd in May 2020. In seeking a preliminary injunction, Uber had to "demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, (1) a likelihood of success on the merits, (2) irreparable injury absent the granting of the preliminary injunction, and (3) a balancing of the equities in the movant's favor" (Gilliland v Acquafredda Enters., LLC, 92 A.D.3d 19, 24-25 [1st Dept 2011]; see CPLR 6301).

Buah Vape Pen 900mah Instructions, Acer Laptop Wont Turn On Blue Light Flashes Once, Right Buttock Twitching Superstition, Articles C